Skip to content

Aging Ski Teams: Poland and Germany

Can you name a Polish men’s cross country ski racer?  Hmmm.  Poland has certainly been a one woman show of late, thanks to Justyna Kowalczyk.

Which makes the following graph (a continuation of the graphs in this post) not terribly surprising:

So here are some Polish men for you: Janusz Krezelok and Maciej Kreczmer.  Who was that older Polish woman who clearly retired in 1998?  That would be Malgorzata Ruchala.

Poland is another extreme case.  Germany is another team that’s been getting older, despite being a much bigger program:

Continue reading ›

Tagged , , ,

Aging Ski Teams

I sort of just stumbled across these graphs accidentally.  If there’s a point to them, it might be that this is what happens when you have a small ski team that manages to produce a really, really fast skier (or two).

You hold on to them for as long as humanly possible.

First up, Estonia.

All I’ve done here is plot the FIS points for all Estonian skiers in major races (WC, OWG, WSC) and varied the color of the dot with the age of the skier.

You can literally watch the Estonian ski team aging!  (I’ve used FIS points for sprinting as well, just for a change of pace.)  Just how long will Andrus Veerpalu and Jaak Mae ski for?  What will Estonia do when they retire?  The world awaits an answer…

Estonia is a pretty extreme case, though.  France, for instance:

Continue reading ›

Tagged , ,

Is Biathlon More Volatile Than Cross Country?

Yes.

That whole shooting bit.  Tricky, isn’t it?

So maybe a bit more discussion would be good.  This graph shows the distributions of the median absolute deviations (MADs) by athlete and season, for those athletes who competed in at least five major competitions in that season.

Biathletes, due to wild swings in shooting performance, are much more likely to have results that bounce around from good to bad.

[ad#AdBriteBanner]

Tagged , ,

Week In Review: Friday Oct 1st

Happy October everyone!  Can’t you just smell the ski season around the corner?

Previously on Statistical Skier:

  • We took a look at the quality of OPA Cup and Scandinavian Cup (sort of a minor league race series for the World Cup) races as measure by the FIS points awarded to the top skiers at those races.
  • I revisited some triathlon data that a friend sent me, in order to share some wacky (to me) looking scatterplots of the associations between your performances in each leg (Swim, Bike, Run) and your overall performance.  Adam shared some expert opinion in the comments that sheds some light on the issue.
  • Finally, I got super-technical (at least, compared to what I usually do) and modelled the length of a World Cup skier’s career using survival analysis models, looking for some factors that might be associated with longer or shorter careers.

Another travel weekend for me.  When will my friends stop getting married?  Ever?

World Cup Survival Analysis

When most people say that World Cup skiers are animals, they probably mean they are fierce, strong competitors.  I got my PhD in statistics in a department that found itself working quite often with very strong wildlife biology and ecology departments, so for me that reference leads me to think, “Well, what if they really were animals?  What sorts of statistics might I end up doing on these data?”

A common statistical analysis when your subjects actually are wild animals is called survival analysis.  Very generally, the aim is to determine what factors influence the survival of, say, bears[1. Usually, the organism isn’t nearly this exciting.  Typically I’d see data on something like the western spotted shrew, or the golden mantled ground squirrel.  One of those animals I made up, the other I did not.].  The poor biologist would spend countless hours over multiple summers capturing, tagging and then tracking and recapturing the shrews or slugs or whatever[2. Stats grad students would frequently talk about how grateful we were that we didn’t have to do field work.].

The end result would be a bunch of lifetime data (along with other variables) on individual organisms.  Then the question is, which variables seem to influence survival rates?  There are all sorts of technical details with this kind of data (censoring, mainly) on how to model it that I’m not going to get into here.  If some nerdy biologist is reading this and wants more details, let me know, and I’ll put them in the comments.

Continue reading ›

Tagged , , , , ,

In Which I Connect Triathlon Data To XC Pursuit Races

The connection is pretty obvious, actually.  Both are mass start races that involve switching activities at least once during the race.  The change in activities is certainly more extreme in triathlon, but you get my drift.

Some people (like, say, me) complain on occasion that pursuit races in cross-country skiing place too great an emphasis on the skating portion.  The order of techniques has settled into always doing classic first and then skating for practical reasons (having the classic skis waxed properly and delivered at the right time would be hectic, to say the least).  But the result has been races that plod[1. No offense intended, obviously.  I probably couldn’t keep up with the “leisurely” pace of the classic portion.] along during the classic half and then finally people start to accelerate during the later stages of the skating portion.

The triathlon data I ran into recently happened to give a very stark picture of what happens to the relative importance of each activity in these types of races.  While noodling around with the data, I plotted scatterplot matrices of the ranks for each stage of the triathlon for men and women (click through for larger versions): Continue reading ›

Tagged , , ,

OPA Cup vs Scandinavian Cup: Quality

With more North Americans sojourning over to Europe to participate in high-level European racing that isn’t quite World Cups, I thought it might be interesting to take a closer look at the OPA (or Alpen) Cup and Scandinavian Cup series in a bit more detail.

As the name might imply, the Scandinavian Cup races are in, well, Scandinavia.  The racers are nearly all from Norway, Finland and Sweden (although Estonia has a large showing as well).  The OPA Cups are more continental European affairs, with racers coming mainly from Italy, Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria, among others.

Both circuits are, to my knowledge, generally considered a sort of “minor league” racing circuit just below the World Cup.  To get some sense of the competitiveness of these races, here’s a plot of the FIS points awarded to the top five finishers in distance events in each circuit:

For the men, the two series seem roughly on par while the women’s Scandinavian Cups appear slightly more competitive.  Of course, this assumes we trust the system of assigning race penalties to accurately gauge the strength of the field on a particular day.

For comparison, the US SuperTour series (probably the highest level racing circuit in the US) has in recent years seen penalties (i.e. the FIS points awarded to the winner) averaging in the neighborhood of 40-60 FIS points for men and 80-100 FIS points for women.

[ad#AdSenseBanner]

Tagged , , , ,