Skip to content

Odds + Ends From Kuusamo

Annsi Pentsinen

Doogiski over at NordicXplained asked how Pentsinen’s 4.3 second win in qualification on Friday stacks up historically. Quite impressively, it turns out.

That’s the second largest qualifying round winning margin for the men’s field in WC, OWG or WSC races. The only larger one was almost 10 years ago, with a 4.7 second victory by Björn Lind in a freestyle sprint in Germany in December of 2001. So we’re reaching back to the very beginning years of sprinting here.

Ola Vigen Hattestad came close to this once last season, winning qualification by 3.86 seconds.

A winning margin greater than 4 seconds in qualifying has happened more often with the women: six times. And it’s basically a who’s who of dominant female skiers over the past decade: Skari, Neumannova, Bjørgen (twice), Kowalczyk and Majdic. Skari’s is particularly absurd. She won qualifying in a WC sprint in Italy way back in the day (December 2001 again) by 8.4 seconds! It was classic, so maybe waxing was an issue, or maybe Skari was just that fast. Interestingly, the woman she beat that day be 8.4 seconds was Petra Majdic.

More generally, the typical winning margin in qualification is just under a second for the men and about 1.5 seconds for the women. Continue reading ›

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Race Snapshot: Kuusamo 10/15k Classic Handicap

I can’t remember if FIS even calls these pursuits or handicap starts or whatever anymore. They keep changing the names of things…and they seem pretty confused themselves, as they once again posted the mini-tour stage results for the men in place of just today’s results (but not for the women).

As per usual, with these pursuit style races in stage races, the “stage” results can yield some unusual results, as many top skiers are not racing for the stage win, but their overrall position.

Tagged , , , ,

Race Snapshot: Kuusamo 5/10k Freestyle

FIS has decided to make my life more difficult than usual, by not posting the actual results (as of this writing), but only the cumulative tour standings. (And no, putting the real results in a PDF doesn’t count. PDFs are the file format of Satan.) So it took me a while to work around that. Hopefully they get their act together. As a side note, I’m not sure, but I think their FIS point calculations are plagued by rounding errors. I don’t usually calculate them myself, but in this case I had to.

Tagged , , , ,

Race Snapshot: Kuusamo Classic Sprint

I’ve been saying that in order for Kikkan Randall to have a shot at winning the WC sprint overall title, she’ll have to dramatically improve her classic sprinting. Looks like she may have done just that…

Tagged , , ,

Missed Medals

Missed Medals

A reader asked on Twitter the other day if I’d recalculate the tallies for Kris Freeman’s top ten, top three, etc. results if we went back and removed a certain Estonian skier from prior results sheets.

I’m going to preface this with some standard caveats about how I can’t know for sure when Andrus Veerpalu was clean or not clean. He certainly failed a drug test recently, and the way public opinion works with doping is that basically all his results are now suspect. I’m agnostic on that question, but since this was a fairly interesting data exercise, I thought I indulge the haters out there.

But I’m going to take it one step further and tally the missed opportunities for all skiers, not just Freeman, if we remove Veerpalu. We’ll start with the least important consequences and work our way up.

There were 78 different skiers who would have moved up into the World Cup points (from 31st to 30th) if you removed Veerpalu. There wasn’t really one skier who bore the brunt of this; the most it happened to any one skier was 3 times. North Americans in this group include Kris Freeman, Carl Swenson, George Grey,  and  Dan Roycroft, all once.

Next, removing Veerpalu will move some skiers up from 11th to 10th. This was also fairly evenly spread out among 43 different skiers, including Carl Swenson again.

More dramatically, removing Veerpalu from the results will bump 13 different skiers up from 4th to 3rd. Here is where we finally include Freeman’s famous WSC “medal”. Also notable is that Mathias Fredricksson would gain three more podium finishes in WC races due to this change.

Finally, the big kahuna, and I was a little shocked at the results. There were five skiers who would gain a victory out of this transaction. Two Olympic gold medals and two WSC gold medals. When Veerpalu’s ten wins get apportioned out, one skier gets five of them: Frode Estil. And it kind of makes sense, since he was another classic ultra-specialist.

I didn’t bother removing any of the Finns or Russians (although a lot of the Russians who’ve been caught haven’t been nearly as accomplished). Perhaps I’ll tackle that in a follow up. Continue reading ›

Tagged , , , ,

Sjusjøen Recap

Finally, the World Cup season is under way. The individual 10/15km freestyle races this past weekend had some predictable performances (the Norwegian women) and some not so predictable performances (Swedish men).

Men

Let’s focus on just three of the men with notable performances on Saturday:

Definitely strong races for each of these guys, but there are some differences. Note that in Johan Olsson’s case, the past three seasons have seen him more or less plateau, and maybe even fall off a bit. He hasn’t laid down an effort quite like that in some time. Given his age and the trend over the past few seasons, I’d guess that we aren’t going to see Olsson pull this rabbit out of his hat each weekend, but you never know.

Calle Halfvarsson, on the other hand, is quite young, only around 22 I believe. For some reason I had it in my head that he was more of a sprinter, but looking back at his results I see now that he’s not quite that lopsided. He has racked up a 1st and 5th place in the WJC sprints, and several top 30 appearances in WC sprints, once as high as 9th. His distance results haven’t looked quite as impressive, but they certainly haven’t been poor. One interesting point to make is that after some strong WJC results, Halfvarsson had some strong results in WC races last season, including the sprints I mentioned. But he didn’t fare well at U23’s last year, finishing 23rd, 25th and 27th. This is a good reminder that you can’t put too much emphasis on a single set of championship level races in evaluating skiers.

All that said, this Saturday’s race was clearly out of the ordinary for him. I’d guess this performance is a good sign for him, but I wouldn’t expect him to do this every weekend this year. Even if this is his best result of the season, and the rest of his races fall between this performance and his median from last year, that would represent an enormous jump.

There was plenty of excitement about Alex Harvey’s 5th place, particularly on this side of the Atlantic. In contrast with Olsson and Halfvarsson, though, this result doesn’t look nearly as extreme for Harvey. If anything, I’d call this a strong race, but not at the outer limits of what he’s shown before. That’s why I’m taking Alex Harvey very seriously this season. Continue reading ›

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

New Statistical Skier Features

I’ll have a post up on Wednesday with some items from this weekends World Cup races. But I’ve been busy over the off-season and the site has seen some fairly major changes, so I need to take a second to describe what’s new.

First, some general housekeeping. Regular readers may notice that I’m going to keep to a rigid posting schedule this winter of Mon-Wed-Fri (hopefully, this will appease the haters). There are several reasons for this, but mostly I’m just a lot busier. I’m working full-time instead of part-time and the Statistical Wife and I are expecting our first kid any week now. So, I’m going to have my hands full this winter!

Second, I need to acknowledge the enormous contribution that Brayton Osgood, (former professional ski racer, current Dartmouth College DTeam coach, all around great guy)  has made to this site. I haven’t mentioned his presence here before, but he’s been invaluable in much of the behind the scenes web stuff. While I’m ultimately responsible for all the content on the site, Brayton has also been an important sounding board while I’m writing posts and analyzing data. I get the lion’s share of the attention for this site, but Brayton is very much a part of the Statistical Skier team. Credit where credit is due.

Ok…here’s what new:

User Generated Graphs

There’s a link above the tabs to data.statisticalskier.com (or at least there should be; the PHP was acting odd this weekend. If you don’t see it, try clearing your cache). This was by far the biggest project, and allows you guys to generate some of the basic types of graphs I use on the site. There is a FAQ tab on that page that runs through some of the basics, but hopefully the forms should be fairly self explanatory.

Please keep in mind that this page is still in beta! It might be slow, it might not work at all at times. We’ll be continuing to work on it, so hopefully it will get more polished and stable over time.

Head over there and have fun playing around!

Power Rankings

I know, I know. Not another points system for ranking athletes.

But if you think about the tools we have now, they are all percent back based systems like FIS points and they’re either a little too specific (FIS points for a specific race) or too general (FIS points profile from the entire past year). What I’d like to see is something more akin to ESPN’s Power Rankings for baseball, that captures who’s hot right now. So I went about building it.

My starting point was a basic ELO system, like what is widely used in the chess world. It’s based on the idea that the best way to compare performance is to use individual head-to-head match-ups between two skiers. The general idea is that everyone starts with a big pile of points. Let’s be concrete and think of them as a pile of stones. If you ski in a race, that constitutes multiple ‘matches’ against all the other skiers in that race. Each skier that beats you takes a few stones from your pile and adds them to their pile. Similarly, you take a few stones from each pile of the skiers that you beat. The number of stones that changes hands is weighted according the time gap between the two skiers and the relative size of skier’s piles of stones. There are several other minor tweaks and adjustments, but that’s the basic idea.

This is trickier to implement than it may seem. It’s a little finicky and can be sensitive to fairly arbitrary decisions about how much weight to apply to various components. But I think I’ve got it working fairly well, so we’ll give it a shot. The idea here is that this is not a serious performance measure, but a fun one. You know, the sort of thing you argue about with your coworkers at the water cooler. So don’t take it too seriously.

The current top ten ranking will always be in the tabs in the right sidebar. The distance rankings have been updated to include this weekend’s World Cup opener. (These Power Rankings use the points from the close of the previous season as a starting point.) Each discipline lists two values, the change in rank from last week and the change in their score. Keep in mind that these scores have no units. They just represent ‘the number of stones in someone’s pile’. I’ll be updating these Power Rankings more or less weekly (following the WC schedule), and I may write a post or two talking about any interesting movement they show.

If you’re at all familiar with ELO ranking systems, you may be aware that one of their limitations is that they assume a reasonably ‘well-mixed’ population. What that means is that it assumes that everyone is racing against everyone else fairly regularly. So the World Cup circuit is a reasonable group to apply this to, since it consists of a mostly fixed group of skiers competing against each other regularly. I have tinkered with extending this to all races, but it performs poorly. As you might imagine, the North American and European racing communities are not always very well mixed, so you end up with some pretty wild behavior.

Race Snapshots

I feel like people really liked the race snapshot graphs I made last season, but there were just too many of them, and they cluttered up the main page and the RSS feed. So the race snapshot graphs will all be found on a separate page (see the tab above) and will not appear in any RSS feeds. Moving these of the front page, and dialing things back to three posts a week should keep the content here more manageable and focused (and hopefully, higher quality).

Anyway, that’s what Brayton and I have been working on all summer. Enjoy!

[ad#AdSenseBanner]

Tagged , , ,